10.4 C
Belgrade
Supported byspot_img
spot_img

Sweden Backs Sale of Vattenfalls German Coal Mines to Czech Group EPH

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Czech energy company Energeticky a prumyslovy holding, or EPH, signed an agreement to acquire the Swedish state-owned utility’s loss-making assets in Germany. EPH made the bid together with PPF Investments, a private equity group.

Sweden’s Social Democratic government said Saturday it is endorsing the sale of state-owned Vattenfall AB’s four coal mines and mining assets in Germany to Czech investors, sparking harsh reactions from environmentalists.

“The deal is of strategic importance for the company and that it is financially best option,” Enterprise and Innovation Minister Mikael Damberg said. “The value of selling is higher than to keep and continue operating the business.”

Supported by

He didn’t disclose details about the price.

Climate minister Isabella Lovin of Sweden’s Environment Party told a joint news conference the government “had thoroughly investigated the deal but didn’t find any formal reasons to reject it.”

In April, Czech energy company Energeticky a prumyslovy holding, or EPH, signed an agreement to acquire the Swedish state-owned utility’s loss-making assets in Germany. EPH made the bid together with PPF Investments, a private equity group.

The Swedish company seeks to shift its energy strategy. Vattenfall had made large write-downs on its operations in Germany.

Environmentalists have called on Sweden’s government to stop the sale and dismantle the coal assets to prevent climate-warming CO2 emissions.

Jan Kowalzig, a climate change adviser at Oxfam Germany, said the Swedish government “is spurning the landmark treaty on climate change adopted last year in Paris,” calling the sale “a failed attempt to clean up Vattenfall’s dirty environmental record.”

“It fosters the continued digging up and burning of dirty coal in the region,” he said in a statement.

Greenpeace spokeswoman Annika Jacobson said it “implies a direct subversion of the Paris Agreement.”

Four environmental activists were briefly detained last month after climbing on top of the entrance of the Swedish government headquarters disguised as construction workers to protest the sale. In May, an environmental activist was arrested for squirting a red liquid from the spectators’ gallery during a debate on the issue in Parliament.

Last year, 195 countries reached a deal on curbing global warming. The so-called Paris agreement aims to keep the global temperature rise below 2 degrees Celsius (3.6 degrees Fahrenheit) compared with preindustrial times. It enters into force once 55 countries representing at least 55 percent of global emissions have joined it.

“Europe needs to phase out coal as soon as possible to stand a chance of meeting the Paris Agreement,” said Johan Rockstrom, a professor of Global Sustainability at Stockholm University. “This decision is disgraceful and unacceptable.”

source: abcnews. go.com

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

U.S. Forest Service proposes major stibnite mine expansion, ignites debate on environmental impact

The U.S. Forest Service has issued a draft record of decision authorizing a significant expansion of operations at the Stibnite Gold Mine in Central...

China’s growing control over critical minerals: Implications for global supply chains and geopolitics

China's dominance in critical minerals continues to escalate, significantly impacting global manufacturing, cross-border investments and geopolitical dynamics. As a leading producer of graphite, lithium,...

America’s mineral crisis: The urgent need to address China’s dominance and reform mining policy

For over a decade, Washington has been vocal about the necessity to reduce China's dominance over global mineral supplies. Both Presidents Trump and Biden...

India and UAE partner to secure critical mineral supply chains

India and the UAE solidified their commitment to securing critical mineral supply chains through a newly signed memorandum of understanding (MoU). The agreement was...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!