19.9 C
Supported byspot_img

197 investors sue Glencore over “untrue statements” in its prospectuses

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Glencore, a major employer in the Sudbury area and a recognized giant on the global mining stage, is in the midst of a legal battle with nearly 200 investors claiming that Glencore made “misleading or untrue statements” with respect to prospectus statements that were reported to cover up corrupt activities.

“A total of 197 funds are seeking damages from Swiss mining giant Glencore over allegations that the company made misleading or untrue statements in its prospectuses to cover up corrupt activities,” said the recent lead story in the Mining Technology business website.

“Dozens of the world’s biggest asset managers have accused the trading house Glencore of lying in past share prospectuses to cover up corrupt activities, escalating a far-reaching action in London’s High Court that could have significant ramifications for the natural resources industry,” said the story in the Financial Times website.

Supported by

“Nearly 200 funds — including some managed by Fidelity, Vanguard, Legal & General, HSBC, Abrdn and Invesco — are seeking damages from Glencore over allegations that the company and its senior leadership made misleading statements that covered up corrupt activities,” said the Financial Times story.

The investors’ lawsuit has been initiated through the high court in London, and is a follow-up to Glencore pleading guilty in 2022 to several charges of bribery and market manipulation. After a lengthy investigation, Glencore agreed to pay $1 billion in fines in the U.S., £280 million in the UK and $40 million in Brazil in that case.

The claimants are alleging that they suffered a loss as a result of the “untrue statements” and omissions made by Glencore as far back at its 2011 prospectus filed with the London Stock Exchange, and later for Glencore’s 2013 prospectus for its merger with Xstrata.

The Financial Times report said the long list of claimants includes sovereign wealth funds such as GIC, Norges Bank, Mubadala, Aabar Holdings, Kuwait Investment Authority, and Oman Investment Authority. Dozens of pension funds have also joined the lawsuit, said the Financial Times and this includes the Ontario Pension Board, Scottish Widows, and BP and Shell pension funds.

The allegations against the company by the investors have not been tested in court.


Source: sudbury

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

Rio Tinto Assures on 2500 Pages – There is a Solution for Every Danger

Rio Tinto executed a move announced six months ago – they published drafts of environmental impact studies on how harmful the lithium mine in...

Critical Materials Act: Europe’s strategy for securing green technology supply chains

In May 2024, the EU Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA) came into force, setting ambitious benchmarks for the domestic production and diversification of strategic...

Critical materials and the path to resilience: Europe’s quest for technological independence

The sustainability and resilience of modern economies hinge critically on the availability and management of key raw materials, such as lithium, cobalt and nickel....

“Protect Jadar and Rađevina”: No dialogue with Rio Tinto, their study is illegal

The association "Protect Jadar and Rađevina" announced today that they oppose opening any dialogue with the company Rio Sava Exploration regarding its environmental impact...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!