14 C
Belgrade
Supported byspot_img
spot_img

Harmonizing green tech and mining: Finding the balance

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

The technologies crucial for combating the climate crisis ironically rely on an industry with a tarnished environmental track record. Mining, notorious for excessive water usage, chemical pollution, biodiversity destruction, and human rights violations, also contributes roughly 10 percent of global energy-related greenhouse gas emissions.

Despite these drawbacks, the demand for metals and minerals essential for manufacturing electric vehicles, wind turbines, solar panels, and batteries is set to skyrocket. By 2050, the World Bank projects a 500 percent surge in demand for materials like copper, bauxite, cobalt, nickel and manganese.

As the mining industry becomes increasingly intertwined with climate solutions, there’s an apparent incongruity. Aimee Boulanger, executive director of the Initiative for Responsible Mining Assurance (IRMA), highlights this paradox, emphasizing the urgent need for change.

Supported by

Efforts to make mining greener are gaining momentum. Companies are leveraging technology to optimize operations and reduce carbon emissions. Initiatives include improving the efficiency of diesel trucks, utilizing renewable energy sources like solar electricity, and adopting innovative waste management practices.

However, the industry still grapples with significant environmental and social challenges. Water usage and waste management remain top concerns, with tailing ponds posing risks of collapse and toxic contamination.

Boulanger underscores the industry’s ongoing transformation, emphasizing the importance of organizations like IRMA in holding companies accountable. The mining sector’s reputation for harm underscores the need for systemic change, driven by strengthened regulations and market incentives for sustainability.

Recycling offers a promising avenue for mitigating the environmental impact of mining. By repurposing electronic waste and reprocessing mining waste, valuable metals and rare-earth elements can be recovered with reduced energy and water consumption.

Yet, Diego Marin of the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) stresses the imperative to address rampant overconsumption. Transitioning from a focus solely on recycling to a broader ethos of reducing, reusing, and rethinking consumption patterns is essential for achieving true sustainability.

Ultimately, while technological advancements can mitigate mining’s environmental footprint, a paradigm shift towards sustainable consumption and production is imperative. The urgency of the energy transition necessitates swift and decisive action to reconcile the mining industry’s role in both exacerbating and alleviating the climate crisis.

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

Evaluating the Jadar lithium project: Weighing the pros and cons

The Jadar lithium project in Serbia, spearheaded by Rio Tinto, has sparked significant debate among various stakeholders. Aimed at extracting lithium and borates from...

Environmental groups demand meeting on North Macedonia’s mining strategy amid concerns over sustainability

Around fifty civil society organizations and environmental institutions in North Macedonia are calling for a meeting with relevant authorities to discuss guarantees for environmental...

Zimbabwe set to launch incentives for local mineral processing to increase economic value

Zimbabwe is set to introduce incentives aimed at encouraging mining companies to process their outputs locally, according to President Emmerson Mnangagwa. Speaking at a...

Serbian parliament rejects lithium mining ban amid environmental concerns and political tensions

The Serbian parliament rejected proposed amendments to the Law on Mining and Geological Research that aimed to ban lithium and boron exploration. The vote...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!