23.5 C
Belgrade
Supported byspot_img
spot_img

The EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act and its implications for China-EU economic relations

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Experts from China have expressed concerns over the European Union’s (EU) recent move to seek alternatives to China’s raw material supplies, suggesting that it could strain economic and trade relations between the two entities. The EU’s adoption of the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), announced by the European Council, aims to ensure a secure and sustainable supply of critical raw materials necessary for various sectors including green and digital transitions, as well as defense and space industries.

The CRMA sets ambitious benchmarks for the EU’s consumption of raw materials, emphasizing local extraction, processing within the EU, and increasing use of recycled materials. This strategic shift intends to reduce dependence on single mineral import sources and challenges China’s role as a major supplier.

Yang Chengyu, an associate research fellow at the Institute of European Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, highlights the potential impact on China-EU economic cooperation. He notes that the CRMA could intensify competition for critical mineral resources, creating a collision between China and the EU. Moreover, the regulation is perceived as having strong ideological undertones.

Supported by

Despite the EU’s efforts, experts point out that China retains a strong position in critical mineral mining, processing, and manufacturing. For instance, China dominates the refining of rare-earth elements, cobalt, nickel, and lithium globally. This dominance positions China as a crucial supplier to the EU, particularly in the green sector.

Given China’s significant production capacity and technological advantages, the EU’s pursuit of alternatives to Chinese raw materials may lead to increased costs. Yang suggests that the EU could struggle to bear these rising costs, given China’s economic competitiveness in green transformation and product manufacturing.

In essence, while the EU’s CRMA aims to diversify raw material sources, it risks straining economic ties with China and escalating competition for critical resources. China’s stronghold in the global supply chain for green industries underscores its importance to the EU’s transition efforts, potentially complicating the EU’s pursuit of self-sufficiency in raw materials.

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

Navigating Serbia’s lithium debate: Economic prospects and environmental risks

The prospect of lithium extraction in Serbia has reignited fears of environmental devastation among its citizens, following the European Commission's (EC) announcement of negotiations...

Struggle for lithium: Divisions emerge in Portugal’s rural communities

For generations, Aida Fernandes' family has called a village nestled in Portugal's northern mountains home. Here, they tended to cattle and cultivated grapes in...

Lundin Mining implements sustainability-linked loan terms

Lundin Mining Corporation has recently revised the terms of its two credit facilities, namely a US$1.75 billion revolving credit facility and a US$800 million...

Strategic solutions: EU’s Critical Raw Materials Act and sustainable tech transition

The transition towards climate sustainability is inherently linked to a transition in materials usage. While past international focus was primarily on oil, gas and...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!