25.7 C
Supported byspot_img

European Commission & Gazprom to settle case out of court?

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Gazprom’s contracts are interstate contracts which gives them a certain international law status. The European Commission (EC) is not setting any time limits for finalizing the investigation against Gazprom, a representative of the EC said on Wednesday subsequent to the results of closed hearings of Gazprom case in Brussels late on Tuesday.

“The European Commission is not setting any time limits for finalizing the antimonopoly investigation against Gazprom,” the representative said.

Meanwhile, another source confirmed to TASS that Gazprom and the EC “are exploring the possibilities of settling the case out of court,” which imply settlement of existing claims with no fines.

Supported by

At the hearing Gazprom expressed disagreement with the EC conclusions on breaching the European competition regulations by the company, Gazprom Deputy Chairman of the Management Committee Alexander Medvedev said earlier.

The company’s delegation headed by Medvedev presented at the hearing facts and analytical findings on items of the notice of claims put in by the European Commission during the investigation. Gazprom requested oral hearings in order to demonstrate why the company considers the EC accusations unjustified and based on substantial methodological errors.

“We disagree with the findings of the European Commission, particularly regarding Gazprom’s “extremely high prices” for gas. The facts and the data we’ve presented vividly demonstrate why we consider the position of the Commission economically unjustifiable and legally flawed,” Medvedev said.

Also, Gazprom assumes the European Commission is not paying sufficient attention to the international public law norms while investigating, particularly regarding “market segmentation” and accusations of “limiting competition.” “In fact, the majority of our commercial contracts in engaged countries were signed within intergovernmental agreements, which should be taken into account. We’re still committed to an open dialog with the European Commission for searching a mutually acceptable solution,” Medvedev said.


Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

Ukraine’s strategic importance in global critical raw material supply chains amid geopolitical dynamics

Ukraine's role in global supply chains for critical raw materials is increasingly pivotal amidst ongoing geopolitical challenges. These include the Russian invasion of Ukraine,...

Nornickel in talks with China Copper for copper smelting venture in China

Russian mining giant Nornickel is reportedly in discussions with China Copper to establish a smelting facility in China. This joint venture aims to relocate...

Pan Asia Metals secures option agreement for RK Lithium Prospect in Thailand

Pan Asia Metals Limited has taken a significant step forward by securing an exclusive option agreement for the RK Lithium Prospect in Thailand. This...

Critical Metals partners with Obeikan Group to build lithium hydroxide plant in Saudi Arabia

Mining company Critical Metals has finalized a joint venture (JV) agreement with the Obeikan Group to establish a lithium hydroxide processing plant in Saudi...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!