31.4 C
Belgrade
Supported byspot_img
spot_img

Brskovo mine concession canceled: Montenegro puts citizen welfare first

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

The Brskovo mine in Mojkovac will remain inactive, as the necessary conditions for terminating the concession agreement for detailed geological surveys and the extraction of lead and zinc ores in this area have been met, announced Saša Mujović, the Minister of Energy and Mining.

“We have met the necessary conditions, and consequently, the concession agreement for detailed geological surveys and the extraction of polymetallic sulfide ore within the former Brskovo mine area will be terminated. In essence, there will be no mining operations in Mojkovac,” stated Mujović during a press briefing.

The deadline for Tara Resources, the company involved, to submit a revised feasibility study expired on May 25. As they failed to meet this requirement, the conditions for terminating the concession agreement have been fulfilled. “We identified certain breaches of the contract by the concessionaire. We provided them with notice and granted them a 30-day window to rectify these shortcomings,” explained Mujović.

Supported by

With no response received by the stipulated deadline, the conditions for unilaterally terminating the agreement have been met, without further extensions.

This decision marks the end of a lengthy process initiated in 2010, finally alleviating the concerns of the Mojkovac residents.

“As a government, we’ve upheld a responsible stance, prioritizing the welfare and health of our citizens. Nevertheless, we also afforded the company fair opportunities to address our concerns,” emphasized Mujović.

While Montenegro welcomes investments and investors, adherence to the country’s laws is non-negotiable.

“Our role is to ensure favorable conditions, uphold the rule of law, and maintain transparency throughout the process. Tara Resources’ feasibility study, submitted twice, failed to comply with Montenegro’s legislation,” reiterated Mujović.

Regarding the concessionaire’s future actions, Mujović outlined that the company could opt to appeal to the Commercial Court or initiate arbitration.

“Ultimately, the decision rests with them, but we remain prepared for all eventualities, confident in the righteousness of our cause,” concluded Mujović.

As for the potential ramifications of losing an arbitration, Mujović refrained from providing an estimate, expressing a desire to avoid such a scenario.

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

EU and Serbia forge strategic partnership for critical raw materials amid lithium mining reversal

Johanna Bernsel, the European Commission’s Spokesperson for the Internal Market, reiterated the EU's commitment to forging a strategic partnership with Serbia on critical raw...

Zinc of Ireland reveals significant germanium find at Kildare zinc-lead project

Zinc of Ireland is poised to capitalize on new opportunities following the discovery of 'elevated' levels of germanium at its Kildare zinc-lead project in...

EU nations form alliance to secure investments in critical raw materials

Jack Lifton, Co-Chair of the Critical Minerals Institute (CMI), pointed out a critical deficiency in government strategy, asserting, “The government lacks subject matter expertise...

Euromax Resources challenges North Macedonian concession merger decision in legal battle

Canada's Euromax Resources, known for its Ilovica copper mine project in North Macedonia, is embroiled in a legal dispute following the Administrative Court's dismissal...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!