-0 C
Belgrade
Supported byspot_img
spot_img

Tara Resources disputes a governmental ruling in Montenegro, putting forth arguments supported by evidence

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

The arguments proposed by the working group for terminating the concession agreement that the state has with the company Brskovo Mine are factually inaccurate, do not correspond with the law, and are inconsistent with the Government’s policy over the past four years, stated Tara Resources.

The company stated that they were granted the concession rights in 2018 and have since invested significant funds to fulfill all their exploration obligations, which the Government confirmed were met in June 2019.

“The Government has already twice extended the deadlines in the concession agreement due to delays in completing the spatial planning process, as the concession agreement includes a clause that takes into account administrative delays,” the statement emphasizes.

Supported by

Tara Resources stated that the interdepartmental Government working group recommended to the Government to again extend the concession agreement in October of the previous year due to these delays, and to commence the collection of concession fees.

They mentioned that the Government requested a concession fee of 650 thousand EUR, which the company paid in January, but there was no extension of the deadline.

Tara Resources stated that the conclusions of the new working group, appointed by the Ministry of Energy and Mining, recommend the termination of the concession agreement, although nothing has changed since the last two extensions approved by the Government due to its own delays.

“The arguments used are factually inaccurate and contrary to the last two extensions approved by the government and the recommendations of the working group,” said Tara Resources.

As they stated, this exposes the Government to significant damages for violating the concession agreement, including damage within the bilateral investment treaty between Switzerland and Montenegro.

“Tara Resources has fulfilled all its obligations and demonstrated the potential for significant new development for Montenegro, with the possibility of employing 550 people from the northern part of Montenegro and bringing significant economic benefits to the region and the country, while respecting the best practices in environmental and health protection in the EU, successfully implemented in other zinc mines in Spain, Portugal, and Sweden,” said Tara Resources.

They emphasized that they are confident that what the working group suggested will prove to be factually illegal and incorrect, and that the Government will not adopt those conclusions.

Tara Resources stated that they remain open to constructive dialogue with institutions.

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

Tanzania forms strategic partnership with Finland to boost sustainable mining and exploration

Tanzania has entered a strategic partnership with the Geological Survey of Finland (GTK) to advance its mining sector, focusing on mineral exploration, sustainable mining...

Serbia’s lithium mining battle: Local opposition to EU’s green agenda

In Serbia's Jadar valley, the controversial plans for lithium mining by Rio Tinto, a global mining giant, have sparked fierce opposition from locals and...

Europe’s struggle to compete for Africa’s critical minerals in a global race

The European Union (EU) faces significant challenges in securing a steady supply of critical minerals from Africa, despite the continent holding about 30% of...

Repositioning the U.S. as a global leader in seabed mining policy development

The United States must take a more proactive role in shaping the future of seabed mining by developing a comprehensive policy that integrates ocean...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!