10.1 C
Belgrade
Supported byspot_img
spot_img

EU’s critical raw materials strategy under new political leadership

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

The adoption of the Critical Raw Materials Act by the EU was a significant step towards reducing dependency on essential materials for the green economy. However, with the recent shift to the right in the European Parliament, the implementation and priorities of this Act could face changes.

Key considerations moving forward:

  1. Setting priorities: The new Parliament and Commission will play a crucial role in identifying and classifying critical raw materials. Changes in the political landscape may influence which materials are prioritized and how policies are shaped to promote their responsible sourcing and sustainable use.
  2. Implementation challenges: Turning ambitions into investment decisions will require streamlined permitting processes, dedicated funding, and improvements in competitiveness, such as energy prices and regulatory frameworks.
  3. Demand for electric vehicles: The expected increase in demand for materials like lithium, driven by the growth of the electric vehicle market, poses a significant challenge. Meeting this demand will likely necessitate a combination of new mining projects, increased recycling efforts, and strategic trade agreements.
  4. Environmental and social considerations: Balancing the need for critical raw materials with environmental sustainability and social responsibility will be a central challenge. The new Parliament’s stance on mining and other environmentally impactful activities will be crucial in this regard.
  5. Trade policies: The Commission’s approach to trade agreements will significantly impact the EU’s ability to secure critical raw materials. Ensuring these agreements align with the goals of the Critical Raw Materials Act, particularly regarding sustainability and protection of domestic industries, will be essential.
  6. Industrial capacity: There will be a need to distinguish between raw materials where the EU aims to preserve existing industrial capacity and those where new capacity is needed. Tailored trade negotiations and stricter rules of origin will be important to protect and develop the EU’s strategic raw materials production.

Conclusion:

The new European Parliament and Commission will have a decisive role in shaping the future of the Critical Raw Materials Act and the broader strategy to reduce the EU’s dependency on these materials. Their decisions will impact everything from prioritization and implementation to trade policies and environmental considerations, ultimately influencing the EU’s ability to build a sustainable and competitive green economy.

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

U.S. Forest Service proposes major stibnite mine expansion, ignites debate on environmental impact

The U.S. Forest Service has issued a draft record of decision authorizing a significant expansion of operations at the Stibnite Gold Mine in Central...

China’s growing control over critical minerals: Implications for global supply chains and geopolitics

China's dominance in critical minerals continues to escalate, significantly impacting global manufacturing, cross-border investments and geopolitical dynamics. As a leading producer of graphite, lithium,...

America’s mineral crisis: The urgent need to address China’s dominance and reform mining policy

For over a decade, Washington has been vocal about the necessity to reduce China's dominance over global mineral supplies. Both Presidents Trump and Biden...

India and UAE partner to secure critical mineral supply chains

India and the UAE solidified their commitment to securing critical mineral supply chains through a newly signed memorandum of understanding (MoU). The agreement was...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!