16.5 C
Belgrade
Supported byspot_img
spot_img

Enhancing resilience in the EU raw materials supply chain

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Demand for materials that drive the green and digital transitions is expected to increase significantly. Europe can take action now to avoid being dependent on individual countries for these materials, the latest JRC research says.

Weaning our economy off fossil fuels and switching to a green and digital future is a metal and mineral-intensive undertaking, which involves an unprecedented increase in demand for the materials key to it. For example, the EU’s need for lithium-ion batteries to power our electric cars and for energy storage purposes is expected to shoot up 21-fold by 2050 in a high-demand scenario. Similarly, for wind turbines, EU demand for rare earth metals will increase 4.5 times by 2030 and 5.5 times by 2050, according to the estimates in the JRC’s new foresight study “Supply chain analysis and material demand forecast in strategic technologies and sectors in the EU”.

The foresight study provided the scientific evidence that underpins the Critical Raw Materials Act, published today. The insights in it also contributed to the establishment of the concept and the list of strategic raw materials in the Act.

Supported by

Whereas a critical raw material is characterised by a high risk of supply disruption and its importance for the overall EU economy, a strategic raw material is additionally defined by its importance for strategic areas, its projected demand growth relative to current supply, and the difficulties of scaling up production.

Supply chain dependencies

The foresight report analysed the complete value chains for 15 key technologies across the five strategic sectors responsible for the delivery of the green and digital transitions, and the EU’s defence and space agenda. It provides a forward-looking basis for helping to identify strategic raw materials for key technologies and applications, identify bottlenecks and pinpoint the segments of supply chains that need strengthening.

The report found that China, in particular, controls many stages of such strategic technology supply chains, not least that of raw material extraction and processing. In all of the technologies analysed in the report, there is a huge dependency on imports from China, at various stages of the value chain, ranging from raw materials only (in the case of electrolysers), to raw and processed materials along with components (for example wind turbines and magnets for electric motors) and in some cases, the complete value chain (solar photovoltaics).

The EU is currently at the forefront of the electrolyser industry (which produces hydrogen), is a leader in heat pump technology, and has the largest share in the robotics market for civil exoskeletons. However, the EU is losing global leadership in some of the technologies analysed. For example, since the previous foresight report in 2020, the EU’s share in global wind turbine production has declined from 58% to 34%, while China’s share increased from 23% to 52%.

The fragility of global supply chains and the risks of increased dependence on third countries were made very clear during the COVID-19 pandemic and Russia’s aggression against Ukraine. The EU addressed its dependence on Russian oil and gas by accelerating its energy transition and setting ambitious targets for the deployment of renewable technologies set out in the REPowerEU plan. However, with the expected high demand for such technologies, the EU could risk exchanging one dependency for another, unless it takes action.

Possible measures to strengthen supply chains

The Commission’s Critical Raw Materials Act proposes targeted policy measures to ensure access to the necessary strategic materials and more secure and resilient supply chains. These measures include international partnerships for the diversification of supply, the development of domestic production and processing capacities, recycling and resource efficiency, substitution and innovation, and behavioural changes.

Circularity can play an important role in maintaining secure access to strategic materials in the EU. Contrary to the fossil fuel economy, in which materials are burned, metals and minerals central to the green technologies of the future can often be recovered and recycled. There is considerable potential for improvement in this field, and technological improvements are ongoing. Today, the rare earth elements in end-of-life vehicles are not recycled at all and are usually lost in base metal fractions, according to an upcoming JRC study. Rare earths in existing iron ore streams currently go to waste.

Setting realistic targets for increasing domestic EU sourcing and diversifying supply chains, for example through trade and investment agreements,should also play a greater role. However, in many cases, alternatives for diversifying supply from like-minded and reliable countries may not exist, due to geographical, economic and geopolitical restrictions.

Finally, research and innovation in the area of substitution (with advanced materials for example) are of paramount importance for both the EU’s autonomy and its global leadership.

 

Source: European Commission

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

Winsome Resources unveils promising scoping study for $259 million Adina lithium project in Quebec, Canada

Australia’s Winsome Resources has announced that a scoping study for its $259 million Adina lithium project in Quebec, Canada, highlights the asset's potential as...

Coal India pursues critical minerals in Argentina and Chile to boost clean energy supply

State-run Coal India is actively seeking critical minerals in Argentina and is currently in discussions with Chilean officials regarding lithium, according to India's federal...

Malaysia enhances sustainability efforts in rare earth industry with regulatory review

Malaysia is taking significant steps to enhance the sustainability of its rare earth industry by reviewing the Mineral Development Act through the Natural Resources...

U.S. and Uzbekistan forge agreement to enhance critical minerals cooperation

U.S. Ambassador to Uzbekistan, Jonathan Henick and Uzbekistan’s First Deputy Minister of Geology, Omonullo Nasritdinkhodjaev, signed a Memorandum of Understanding aimed at strengthening cooperation on...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!