15 C
Supported byspot_img

Serbian, Slovakian, Alpine mines were major copper providers in prehistoric Europe

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

An international team of researchers analyzed the geochemistry of copper artifacts from prehistoric Europe and found that those produced before 3500 BC derived exclusively from mines in southeast Europe, especially Serbian mining areas, while later artifacts include ores from the eastern Alps and Slovak Mountains and, much later, potentially the British Isles.

In a paper published in the journal Plos One, the archaeologists explain that early copper artifacts are considered to have a high cultural and historical significance in European prehistory but until now, limited information existed about how copper was used and distributed in Neolithic Europe.

To get more information, the authors analyzed 45 copper objects, including axes, chisels, and other items, from various sites dating to the 4th and 3rd millennia BC of Northern Central Europe and Southern Scandinavia.

Supported by

In detail, they examined the lead isotopic signature of the copper objects to link them to previously sampled sources of ore around the Old Continent.

Their results indicate fluctuations in metallurgic activity over time, including a decrease in the prevalence of copper artifacts around 3000 BC.

According to the group, these changes in the origins and availability of copper likely reflect differences in distribution networks through time, probably influenced by changing economies, social structures, communication networks, and technologies across prehistoric Europe. Further study of the sources and uses of copper artifacts will enhance our understanding of how metal goods were produced and distributed around the continent in the past.

“Based on lead isotope analyses of the largest sample to date of Neolithic copper objects from southern Scandinavia and northern Germany, the study proves that the exchange of metallic objects connected Europe over long distances,” the paper reads. “However, the introduction of new technologies and materials alone did not lead to social changes; their integration required deliberate choices by societies.”


Source: Mining

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

Overcoming the copper supply challenge: Implications for U.S. renewable energy goals

A recent University of Michigan study sheds light on a concerning gap in copper production essential for meeting renewable energy targets in the United...

Unlocking renewable energy potential: The role of renewable hydrogen in storage and decarbonization

Renewable electricity can be effectively stored by converting it into renewable hydrogen or ammonia through the process of electrolysis. These fuels can be utilized...

Empowering renewable energy: Harnessing the potential of renewable hydrogen for storage and decarbonization

Batteries play a crucial role in providing short-term flexibility to the energy system, offering advantages such as geographical and sizing flexibility. Unlike some other...

Energy storage: Enabling clean alternatives and job creation in coal-dependent regions

Energy storage is particularly relevant to carbon-intensive and coal regions, as it provides a cleaner alternative to hard-to-abate industries and traditional fossil-fuel-powered thermal plants...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!