35.8 C
Supported byspot_img

Roadmap for Uzbekistan’s privatization of mining assets

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Uzbekistan’s government sees the path to achieve economic growth by attracting more private funding to the economy, hence the government needs to sell mining assets. To obtain better prices for the assets, they would like to transform the largest state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in the country and improve their efficiency.

In May 2021, Uzbekistan’s State Asset Management Agency (UzSAMA) and the World Bank arranged a high-level international forum to lay out the roadmap for Uzbekistan’s privatisation of some of its most valuable companies.

The quality of the audience was a sign of the government’s commitment to making privatisation a success. Amongst the attendees from the Uzbek government were: Jamshid Kuchkarov, Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Economy and Poverty Reduction; Timur Ishmetov, the Minister of Finance, Omonulla Nasretdinhojaev, first deputy minister of finance, Adham Ikramov, the chairman of chamber of commerce, and industryand the Chairman of UzSAMA, Akmalhon Ortikov.   High-level international participants were also well represented, including the World Bank’s Central Asian vice-president Anna Bjerde, the EBRD’s managing director for Central Asia Zsuzhanna Hargitai, and Sir Suma Chakrabarti, ex-chairman of EBRD who is now working as an advisor to the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan on Economic Development, among many others.

Supported by

The keynote speaker of the event was HE Deputy Prime Minister Jamshid Kuchkarov, who set the tone to the forum by declaring the goal of the government in the mid-term: the government wants to increase GDP per capita from the current $1,700 to $2,500 in 2025 and $4,200 in 2030 and this would require GDP growth of 6 to 7% per annum.

As bne IntelliNews reported in the feature “The Growers,” in 2020 Uzbekistan was one of a handful of countries in the world not to go into recession despite COVID pandemic, due to economic reforms that were launched prior to the pandemic and timely funding from International Financial Institutions (IFIs) to soften the economic blow of the pandemic.

This work has been spearheaded by the Ministry of Finance jointly with UzSAMA and this forum was more of a status check on the progress of this work.

The event was co-arranged with the World Bank to show the commitment of the IFI community’s active involvement in the process and their support of the Uzbek government campaign.

IMF Head of Mission pointed out that Uzbekistan is running a current account deficit and it is currently being financed from international borrowings and this should be replaced or complimented by equity investments. In the case of Uzbekistan where most important sectors are state dominated, transformation of SOEs and privatization of these assets seem to be the most natural next steps to alleviate debt burden. But despite the upbeat talks and serious attitude of the delegates, the proof of the pudding will be in the eating. The Big Four consultants and investment banks, such as Rothschild’s, which is particularly active, are already deeply involved in the transformation, valuation and sell side advisory.

The Minister of Finance Timur Ishmetov during his speech noted that one large bank will be sold by the end of this year, the regional flagship Coca Cola bottler based in Tashkent is in the process of sale and Navoi Mining (one of the largest gold and uranium producers in the world and brings in 30% of the budget of Uzbekistan) is undergoing corporate governance actions and transformation as well.

Ishmetov pointed out that the government was a bit hesitant when they had decided to bring in independent directors to fully state-owned banks, but now they see the positive results and are considering appointing another 100 senior managers to state owned companies. The plan is to sell some 550 state-owned companies by the end of this year and several auctions for large real estate assets have already started.

Ortikov, the Chairman of UzSAMA showed a list of top 10 most profitable companies and bottom 10 largest loss-making companies in the country. The solution to the issue seems to be further reforms of the sectors, attracting private sector as better managers of these assets and increasing profitability, at the same time dealing with social issues related to large layoffs.

The issue of transparency and public accountability came up during the event several times, raised by both by Uzbek government and the international community participants. UzSAMA is committed to transparency with the open declaration of potential buyers and their history, and where the privatization proceeds will go to. The IFIs involved in the process, working with the Uzbek Government and UzSAMA, should help to address these issues.

Another key issue raised during the forum was underdeveloped legislation. The privatization law was adopted in 1991, and this year the government is working on new law that should be adopted by the end of the year.

The question of fair valuation was also raised, where the local valuation standard tends to value assets higher than the market value. The government has already nixed a mandatory requirement of adopting the local valuation as the auction minimum starting bid to throw the process open to greater competition. But that means local standards will have to be brought up to the international levels and it will take time.

Overall, the event was phenomenally successful due to large attendance and very senior government officials present from the beginning till the end of the event. That allowed them to listen to all sides of the issue. This was a good case of a dialogue and cooperation with international community. The biggest challenge facing the Uzbek government seems to be to maintain the balance between going fast to maintain the momentum of the reforms to show successful privatizations are possible, and taking enough time to prepare the privatisations properly. To take a concrete example, the privatization of a chemical company is difficult until natural gas prices, distribution network regulation and electricity market de-regulation have all taken place. The question of if the government go fast and perhaps sell at a lower price to leave the transformation to the strategic investor that acquires the asset or take all the measures (legislative, transformation, corporate governance, transparent reporting) first in order to command a higher asking price remains open.  As the event showed, the IFI are on board with the government to help find the right balance in this tricky question.

Source: intellinews.com



Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

Strategic initiatives: US Efforts in Africa’s critical minerals sector to balance Chinese influence

China's presence in Africa's mining sector has grown steadily, now accounting for approximately 8% of the continent's mining activities, up from 6.7% in 2018....

Uzbekistan’s bold move: Ambitious push to lead global rare earth mining

Uzbekistan's President Shavkat Mirziyoyev has underscored the importance of developing the country's rare-earth mining sector, positioning it as a top priority for his administration...

Navigating Bulgaria’s mining Sector: Rising demand for precious metals

Bulgaria stands out in Europe as the third-largest copper producer and fourth-largest gold producer. Yet, despite the increasing international demand for these metals, the...

Resolving land conflicts in Indonesia’s mining industry with robust ESG initiatives

Indonesia's mining sector, rich in natural resources, has become a global focal point, attracting significant economic interest. However, this boom has brought to light...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!