7.9 C
Belgrade
Supported byspot_img
spot_img

Environmental and Economic groups criticize Australia’s coal mine expansions

Member of Europium Groupspot_img
Supported byspot_img

Environmental and economic organizations have strongly condemned the Australian government’s decision to approve the expansion of three coal mines in New South Wales, labeling the plans as “disastrous” and “out of step” with the nation’s climate goals.

Groups like the Australian Conservation Foundation (ACF) have expressed concerns that the expansions could significantly hinder Australia’s efforts to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050. Gavan McFadzean, the ACF’s climate program manager, highlighted the potential impact, stating, “Together, these coal mines will generate more than 1.3 billion tonnes of lifetime emissions, undermining Australia’s climate commitments.”

The expansions approved by Environment Secretary Tanya Plibersek include Whitehaven Coal’s Narrabri mine, Mach Energy’s Mount Pleasant mine, and Yancoal’s Ravensworth mine, with their commissioning extended for a period of eight to 20 years.

Supported by

Defending the decision

Plibersek defended the government’s approval, asserting that the decisions complied with existing environmental laws. She noted that the emissions resulting from the mines would be considered under the government’s safeguarding mechanism, which is intended to reduce emissions from major polluters. However, critics argue that the current Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation (EPBC) Act 1999 does not adequately address climate change issues.

A report from the University of Melbourne pointed out that the EPBC Act lacks a climate-related “matter of national environmental significance,” meaning a project’s climate impacts alone do not trigger mandatory federal assessment and approval.

While the government has proposed reforms, including the establishment of an independent environmental protection agency and an investment of A$100 million (US$68 million) into environmental approvals, these plans have been deferred indefinitely due to disagreements among ministers.

Concerns over coal viability

The future viability of Australian thermal coal exports is also under scrutiny. The Institute of Energy Economics and Financial Analysis (IEEFA) predicts that export earnings will plummet from A$36 billion in FY2023-24 to around A$21 billion by FY2028-29. This decline is attributed to China’s dominance in the market and decreasing demand from key Asia-Pacific countries like Japan, Korea, and Taiwan.

The IEEFA’s report warns that as demand for Australia’s high-energy coal continues to fall, there may soon be insufficient market support to sustain the mines’ viability.

Supported byElevatePR Digital

Related News

India set to decide on import restrictions for metallurgical coke

India is set to make a decision soon on whether to implement import restrictions on metallurgical coke, a crucial ingredient in steelmaking. According to...

AMMC targets major production milestones by 2030 with ongoing development projects

Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Combine (AMMC) has set ambitious production goals for 2030, aiming to achieve annual output of 500,000 tons of copper, 50...

Kazatomprom partners with Jordan uranium mining company on joint uranium exploration and extraction

Kazatomprom, Kazakhstan's national atomic company, has entered into a collaboration with Jordan Uranium Mining Company (JUMCO) to jointly explore and extract uranium in Jordan....

Saudi Arabia boosts mining sector to secure global mineral supply and support clean energy transition

As part of Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030 initiative, the country is making significant strides toward creating a sustainable economy driven by clean energy. To...
Supported by
Supported by
Supported by
error: Content is protected !!